Artificial intelligence (AI) has rapidly evolved in recent years. Tools like ChatGPT, which rely on natural language processing, are now widely used. These tools can assist users in writing essays, reports, and emails with ease. However, their increasing use in application essays—for colleges, scholarships, and jobs—has raised serious ethical concerns.
Universities and employers value honesty and originality. So, the use of AI in personal writing has sparked debate about fairness, integrity, and authorship.
The Rise of AI in Essay Writing
ChatGPT, developed by OpenAI, can write full essays based on user prompts. It creates content that sounds natural and persuasive. Many applicants, especially those who are non-native English speakers or lack writing confidence, are turning to AI for help. Some use it to correct grammar or organize thoughts. Others rely on it to write their entire essays.
This growing reliance has sparked a major concern: Are the essays truly written by the applicants themselves?
Originality vs. Assistance: The Core Ethical Issue
Application essays aim to reflect an individual’s values, voice, and goals. They show personality and motivation—qualities important for both academic and career success. When AI contributes significantly to writing, the essay may no longer represent the applicant’s true self.
This situation creates two main concerns:
Honesty – Is it ethical to submit an essay that was mostly written by a machine?
Fairness – Do students with better access to technology have an unfair advantage?
Asking for feedback from teachers or using writing centers is common and acceptable. However, having an AI write the bulk of the essay crosses a line. Many experts see it as similar to ghostwriting or plagiarism.
How Institutions Are Responding
Currently, most universities and scholarship programs lack clear rules on AI-generated content in applications. This leaves applicants in a grey zone. Some institutions have started updating their guidelines. They now advise applicants not to use tools that compromise the honesty and integrity of their work.
But enforcing such rules is tough. Unlike traditional plagiarism, AI-generated content is unique and cannot easily be flagged by standard plagiarism tools like Turnitin.
As a result, institutions are facing a challenge. They must protect the integrity of the admissions process while accepting that digital help is now a part of daily life. The solution lies in balanced policies that allow light editing or support—but not full AI authorship.
The Issue of Equity and Access
There’s also an equity problem. Students from wealthier backgrounds are more likely to know about and use advanced AI tools. This puts students from underprivileged backgrounds at a disadvantage. These tools may unintentionally widen existing inequalities in education.
International students may also turn to AI to overcome language barriers. While their goal is often to compete fairly, it raises deeper questions: Is AI truly leveling the field, or is it hiding larger problems in the admissions system?
Protecting the Purpose of the Essay
Application essays are not just writing samples. They are meant to show the applicant’s personality, thinking, and dreams. They help institutions understand the person behind the grades. If AI starts telling those stories, the essays lose their personal value.
Applicants should see AI as a guide—not a writer. They should use it to brainstorm or check grammar, but not to replace their unique voice. At the same time, universities should support students with tools like:
Writing workshops
Essay coaching clinics
Clear policy communication
These steps can reduce the temptation to misuse AI and encourage students to write with honesty. Here you get more tips on How To Write An Essay For A College?
Conclusion
AI tools like ChatGPT offer support, but they also bring ethical risks. Their use in application essays raises questions about honesty, fairness, and the true meaning of personal writing. To address these issues:
Applicants must use AI responsibly.
Institutions must update their policies and support systems.
In the end, the goal should be clear: every applicant deserves the chance to share their story—truthfully, thoughtfully, and in their own words.
